User blog:*mynameischrome*/Character pages and categories

Gah.

Whenever I see a character page, it goes something like this.

pikachu is a very bad character who caused the explosion of the moon and the stars and he's really really really bad and smelly and ugly and this character should be destroyed at all costs because of the things he did!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This is immature. And silly. And ridiculious.

Instead of including his fictional likes and dislikes and hate speech towards the character, why not fill the pages with actual useful information like this:

Pikachu is a character from the video game series Pokemon and it's anime. Pikachu is an electric-type rodent-like yellow creature, and his tail is shaped like a stereotypical lightning bolt.

Why not just include his/her likes and dislikes in an infobox template? We can borrow them from another place.

Who's with me? Let's try redoing all the character articles!

As for the categories like Smart Alecks and Whiny Brats, we should remove those from pages and replace the categories with actual information like Protagonists, Pokemon, Electric-type Pokemon, Characters, etc.

And spamming pages with whatever categories that you can think of is immature. Fill the categories area of the page with as much RELEVENT information as possible, but not so much as it makes the categories area of the page a long wall of text!